TikTok received a frosty reception in its fight to save the platform at the Supreme Court, which during oral arguments Friday ...
A federal appeals court last month upheld the law, determining that the national security concerns were enough to survive the ...
WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Friday voiced skepticism of TikTok’s challenge to a federal law requiring the China-based ...
The Supreme Court appears inclined to uphold a law that would ban the video-sharing app TikTok in the U.S. after Jan. 19 ...
A majority of the justices appeared more concerned about the national security implications of the popular app’s Chinese ...
But in 2024 he was arrested by the FBI. He admits to having used his position to collect information for China and to report on his fellow activists. He did this so that officials in Beijing would ...
Foreign spies are disguising their identities to buy phone numbers and social media accounts in China so they can pose as job recruiters or close friends to gather personal information, ...
Two Chinese spies and a Chinese national who was charged ... recruited employees to travel to China, and solicited their proprietary information, all on behalf of the government of the People ...
The justices, who asked tough questions of both sides, showed skepticism toward arguments by lawyers for TikTok and its users ...
The part left unsaid Notably, China rarely says who these "foreign spies" work for, though these messages have come against the backdrop of frosty tensions between Washington and Beijing.
The Supreme Court appeared to favor the government's national security claims over TikTok's 1st Amendment argument.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback